Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Launched July 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus 8000 and Pentax WG-3, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WG-3 (16MP) but they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe 8000 was announced 5 years prior to the WG-3 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise overview of how the 8000 matches up against the WG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Pentax WG-3. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Pentax WG-3
| 8000 | WG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus 8000
| WG-3 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2013 |  | July 2009 | More recent by 49 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Pentax WG-3
| 8000 | WG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 features outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 has dimensions of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8000 and Pentax WG-3 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the 8000 compared to the WG-3.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and WG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to envision the difference between sensor measurements just by going over technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and WG-3.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Pentax WG-3 to offer extra detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 8000 vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax WG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Pentax WG-3 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2013-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.40 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $300 |