Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Launched February 2018
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and G900 (20MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8000 was introduced 9 years prior to the G900 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick view of how the 8000 scores versus the G900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Ricoh G900. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh G900
| 8000 | G900 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus 8000
| G900 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2018 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 105 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh G900
| 8000 | G900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 has got outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Ricoh G900 has specifications of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the 8000 and the G900.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and G900 is 94 and 89 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to see the gap in sensor sizes only by looking through technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and G900.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Ricoh G900 to render extra detail using its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh G900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh G900 |
| Other name | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2018-02-21 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $380 | $752 |