Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Announced September 2011
- Superseded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively close but the 8000 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") use different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8000 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the GR Digital IV which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the 8000 grades vs the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
8000 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus 8000
GR Digital IV | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 26 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
8000 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 comes with external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh GR Digital IV in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the 8000 versus the GR Digital IV.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and GR Digital IV is 94 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching specs. The picture underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and GR Digital IV.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 8000 using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Olympus 8000 will render more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Also called | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2011-09-15 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 images |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $380 | $599 |