Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e541/6e541f13ef88ea0ca8eaf6180c7a6a686d0521cf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1078/c1078d8ddb245a6ab2a1dc6bdfacc2fe6d159f8a" alt="Ricoh WG-30W front Ricoh WG-30W front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced October 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The 8000 was brought out 6 years before the WG-30W and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summation of how the 8000 matches up vs the WG-30W with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh WG-30W
8000 | WG-30W |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Olympus 8000
WG-30W | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More recent by 64 months |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh WG-30W
8000 | WG-30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 features exterior dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30W has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the 8000 compared to the WG-30W.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d39d/0d39d3a10809265de0518a46464f8c9b3205fe58" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and WG-30W is 94 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10a29/10a29606f85082619fa94934c1defa4bc376516c" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The graphic underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and WG-30W.
All in all, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30W to offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d77f/9d77fbbc6864f56f9b6ec67a8a70904d1356721f" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47ef0/47ef0b0a4cfdcea2b8f2c7ea8b8da1beca7828a9" alt="Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-30W |
Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2014-10-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $380 | $280 |