Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
91 Imaging
43 Features
35 Overall
39
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2022
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WG-80 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 8000 was announced 14 years before the WG-80 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a thorough comparison, here is a quick overview of how the 8000 grades versus the WG-80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Ricoh WG-80
| 8000 | WG-80 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus 8000
| WG-80 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2022 | July 2009 | Fresher by 156 months | |
| Manually focus | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Ricoh WG-80
| 8000 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.70" | Same display measurement | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 enjoys outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-80 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the 8000 vs the WG-80.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and WG-80 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and WG-80.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-80 to give more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 8000 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Also called | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2022-05-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.70" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | - | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $300 |