Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
96 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Olympus 8000 versus Samsung ST150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There is a huge difference among the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and ST150F (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8000 was unveiled 4 years prior to the ST150F which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going into a thorough comparison, here is a quick view of how the 8000 scores versus the ST150F when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Samsung ST150F. The full galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Samsung ST150F
| 8000 | ST150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus 8000
| ST150F | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 | July 2009 | More modern by 42 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Samsung ST150F
| 8000 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 has got external measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Samsung ST150F has sizing of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 8000 versus Samsung ST150F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the 8000 against the ST150F.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and ST150F is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by checking out a spec sheet. The image here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and ST150F.
Clearly, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Samsung ST150F to show more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung ST150F |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 1 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 114g (0.25 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $380 | $300 |