Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
91 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 250g - 109 x 62 x 25mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F Overview
In this write-up, we will be analyzing the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and WB850F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8000 was unveiled 3 years earlier than the WB850F and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the 8000 matches up against the WB850F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Samsung WB850F. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Samsung WB850F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Samsung WB850F
8000 | WB850F |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB850F over the Olympus 8000
WB850F | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | July 2009 | More recent by 30 months | |
Focus manually | Very exact focus | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Crisper screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Samsung WB850F
8000 | WB850F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to lug around your camera, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 features outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Samsung WB850F has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the 8000 versus the WB850F.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and WB850F is 94 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at specs. The photograph here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and WB850F.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Samsung WB850F to resolve greater detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots far more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Samsung WB850F Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung WB850F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Samsung WB850F |
Also called | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-01-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 480fps (176 x 128), 240fps (384 x 288) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 pounds) | 250 grams (0.55 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 25mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $380 | $599 |