Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28


82 Imaging
55 Features
30 Overall
45
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- ()mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 64mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Refreshed by Sigma DP2 Merrill

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the DP1 Merrill (15MP) is fairly close but the 8000 (1/2.3") and DP1 Merrill (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

The 8000 was released 3 years before the DP1 Merrill which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP1 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the 8000 scores against the DP1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Sigma DP1 Merrill. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Sigma DP1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma DP1 Merrill
8000 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | " | Larger display (+2.7") |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1 Merrill over the Olympus 8000
DP1 Merrill | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 31 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP1 Merrill
8000 | DP1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 features physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sigma DP1 Merrill has dimensions of 122mm x 67mm x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") along with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma DP1 Merrill in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the 8000 vs the DP1 Merrill.

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and DP1 Merrill is 94 and 82 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and DP1 Merrill.
As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 8000 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Sigma DP1 Merrill will render extra detail as a result of its extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP1 Merrill Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP1 Merrill |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 15MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4704 x 3136 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | - |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 pounds) | 330 grams (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 64mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $380 | $1,250 |