Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Previous Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Updated by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is fairly similar but the 8000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 8000 was announced 3 years prior to the DP2 Merrill which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the 8000 grades vs the DP2 Merrill when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| 8000 | DP2 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus 8000
| DP2 Merrill | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 31 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| 8000 | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 enjoys external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has sizing of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") having a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Here is the front view measurement comparison of the 8000 vs the DP2 Merrill.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and DP2 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, it is difficult to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The image underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8000 and DP2 Merrill.
As you have seen, each of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 8000 with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will deliver greater detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640x480 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 lbs) | 330g (0.73 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $931 |