Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Released July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Following is a detailed review of the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 8000 was released 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the 8000 scores vs the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| 8000 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus 8000
| DP2 Quattro | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | July 2009 | More modern by 56 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| 8000 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 provides outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the 8000 and the DP2 Quattro.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 8000 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2009-07-01 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 pounds) | 395 gr (0.87 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $931 |