Clicky

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
21
Overall
28
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
62
Features
38
Overall
52

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus 8000
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
  • Released July 2009
  • Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Following is a detailed review of the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a noticeable gap between the image resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The 8000 was released 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before diving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the 8000 scores vs the DP2 Quattro in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 8000 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus 8000

 DP2 Quattro 8000 
RevealedFebruary 2014July 2009More modern by 56 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 8000 DP2 Quattro 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 provides outer measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the 8000 and the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and DP2 Quattro is 94 and 70 respectively.

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes only by checking technical specs. The image underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and DP2 Quattro.

As you have seen, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 8000 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 8000
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
20
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
77
has manual focus
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
offers face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus 8000
Street photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
61
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8000 Sports photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography info
33
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
47
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
low fps (3.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8000 Travel photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography features
61
weather sealing
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
53
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8000 Landscape photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography advice
35
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Time Lapse mode
59
has manual focus
screen size is good (3")
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8000 Vlogging advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging advice
28
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low video resolution (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of mic socket
9
lack of video recording
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8000Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Also Known as mju Tough 8000 -
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Released 2009-07-01 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3968 x 2976 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-102mm (3.6x) 45mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.5-5.1 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Screen tech - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 640x480 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 182 gr (0.40 pounds) 395 gr (0.87 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - BP-51
Self timer Yes (12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal -
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $380 $931