Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 75mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched January 2013
- Replaced the Sigma DP2 Merrill
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the DP3 Merrill (15MP) is relatively well matched but the 8000 (1/2.3") and DP3 Merrill (APS-C) come with totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 8000 was manufactured 4 years prior to the DP3 Merrill and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP3 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short summation of how the 8000 scores versus the DP3 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Sigma DP3 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Sigma DP3 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma DP3 Merrill
| 8000 | DP3 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP3 Merrill over the Olympus 8000
| DP3 Merrill | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma DP3 Merrill
| 8000 | DP3 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 features outside measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sigma DP3 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the 8000 and the DP3 Merrill.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and DP3 Merrill is 94 and 83 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The photograph below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and DP3 Merrill.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 8000 featuring a tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP3 Merrill will give you extra detail due to its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma DP3 Merrill Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP3 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma DP3 Merrill |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 75mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lb) | 330 gr (0.73 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $1,353 |