Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
59 Imaging
41 Features
30 Overall
36
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Boost to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Succeeded the Sigma SD10
- Replacement is Sigma SD15
Photography Glossary Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Here is a thorough review of the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma SD14, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 8000 was unveiled 2 years later than the SD14 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go in to a more detailed comparison, below is a brief overview of how the 8000 matches up versus the SD14 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Sigma SD14. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma SD14
| 8000 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2009 | September 2006 | Fresher by 34 months | |
| Display dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 150k | Sharper display (+80k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Olympus 8000
| SD14 | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma SD14
| 8000 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 features outside dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD14 has dimensions of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") and a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8000 versus Sigma SD14 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the 8000 against the SD14.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and SD14 is 94 and 59 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and SD14.
As you can see, both of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The 8000 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus 8000 will provide you with extra detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent 8000 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma SD14 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2006-09-26 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 5 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 150k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lbs) | 750 gr (1.65 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $198 |