Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
84 Imaging
74 Features
79 Overall
76
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Raise to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched July 2019
- Renewed by Sigma fp L
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) posses totally different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 8000 was unveiled 11 years before the fp which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short summation of how the 8000 matches up against the fp with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sigma fp. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sigma fp
| 8000 | fp |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Olympus 8000
| fp | 8000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2019 | July 2009 | Newer by 122 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3.2" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 2100k | 230k | Sharper screen (+1870k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sigma fp
| 8000 | fp | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 features exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sigma fp has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
See the Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the 8000 versus the fp.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and fp is 94 and 84 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specifications. The pic here will offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and fp.
To sum up, each of these cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 8000 using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Sigma fp will result in greater detail having an extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 8000 vs Sigma fp Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma fp | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sigma fp |
| Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2009-07-01 | 2019-07-11 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 858.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 25 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | - | 6 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Leica L |
| Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 30 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3.2 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 2,100k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | No |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 182g (0.40 lb) | 422g (0.93 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | - | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $380 | $2,050 |