Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
83 Imaging
69 Features
88 Overall
76
Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Expand to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 403g - 120 x 67 x 50mm
- Launched January 2019
Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus 8000 versus Sony A6400, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and A6400 (24MP) and the 8000 (1/2.3") and A6400 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8000 was revealed 10 years prior to the A6400 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sony A6400 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the 8000 scores against the A6400 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sony Alpha a6400. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sony A6400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony A6400
8000 | A6400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A6400 over the Olympus 8000
A6400 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2019 | July 2009 | Fresher by 116 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony A6400
8000 | A6400 |
---|
Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8000 enjoys exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sony A6400 has proportions of 120mm x 67mm x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") with a weight of 403 grams (0.89 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8000 versus Sony A6400 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the 8000 compared to the A6400.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and A6400 is 94 and 83 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by reviewing specs. The photograph below may provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8000 and A6400.
As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8000 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony A6400 will deliver extra detail because of its extra 12 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Sony A6400 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Alpha a6400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Alpha a6400 |
Also called | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-07-01 | 2019-01-15 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 24MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6000 x 4000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 32000 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Sony E |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | - |
Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 121 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 922k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 11.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 6.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Off, auto, on, slow sync, rear sync, redeye reduction, wireless, hi-speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264, XAVC-S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 403 grams (0.89 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 120 x 67 x 50mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 83 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1431 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick DUO (UHS-I compliant) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $380 | $898 |