Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Revealed December 2016
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus 8000 and Sony HX350, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and HX350 (20MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 8000 was released 8 years before the HX350 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the 8000 scores vs the HX350 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony HX350
8000 | HX350 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus 8000
HX350 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | December 2016 | July 2009 | Fresher by 90 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony HX350
8000 | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus 8000 features external dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sony HX350 has specifications of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 and Sony HX350 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the 8000 versus the HX350.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8000 and HX350 is 94 and 62 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing simply by checking specs. The photograph underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and HX350.
All in all, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Sony HX350 to give extra detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older 8000 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2016-12-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lb) | 652 gr (1.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $380 | - |