Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
96 Imaging
39 Features
50 Overall
43
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 133g - 96 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced February 2012
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and TX20 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe 8000 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the TX20 which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX20 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the 8000 matches up against the TX20 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sony TX20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony TX20
8000 | TX20 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX20 over the Olympus 8000
TX20 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | July 2009 | Newer by 32 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Sharper display (+692k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony TX20
8000 | TX20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8000 enjoys physical measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) while the Sony TX20 has measurements of 96mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 133 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the 8000 and the TX20.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and TX20 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions purely by checking specifications. The image below may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and TX20.
To sum up, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Sony TX20 to give extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged 8000 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX20 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX20 |
Also called as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2012-02-28 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus range | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 grams (0.40 lb) | 133 grams (0.29 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 96 x 56 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $380 | $330 |