Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
96 Imaging
33 Features
33 Overall
33
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced July 2009
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 148g - 94 x 57 x 18mm
- Announced February 2010
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the 8000 (12MP) and the TX5 (10MP) is very close but the 8000 (1/2.3") and TX5 (1/2.4") come with different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8000 was released 7 months prior to the TX5 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the 8000 scores against the TX5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery & Sony TX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony TX5
8000 | TX5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX5 over the Olympus 8000
TX5 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2010 | July 2009 | Newer by 7 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony TX5
8000 | TX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus 8000 has got exterior measurements of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) whilst the Sony TX5 has sizing of 94mm x 57mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the 8000 against the TX5.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the 8000 and TX5 is 94 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The image here will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 8000 and TX5.
As you have seen, each of these cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The 8000 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus 8000 will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX5 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX5 |
Also Known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2010-02-18 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focus distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 2 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 2.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 182 gr (0.40 lb) | 148 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 94 x 57 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | - | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/ Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $380 | $239 |