Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55
94 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
97 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 182g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8000
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 109g - 93 x 54 x 13mm
- Released July 2011
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus 8000 versus Sony TX55, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the 8000 (12MP) and TX55 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe 8000 was manufactured 3 years earlier than the TX55 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8000 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX55 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the 8000 scores vs the TX55 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 8000 Gallery and Sony TX55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8000 over the Sony TX55
8000 | TX55 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX55 over the Olympus 8000
TX55 | 8000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | July 2009 | Newer by 25 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
Screen resolution | 1230k | 230k | Clearer screen (+1000k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8000 and Sony TX55
8000 | TX55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8000 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 182 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sony TX55 has dimensions of 93mm x 54mm x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") and a weight of 109 grams (0.24 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 8000 versus Sony TX55 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are using at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the 8000 against the TX55.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8000 and TX55 is 94 and 97 respectively.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The picture underneath should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the 8000 and TX55.
Plainly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Sony TX55 to provide extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged 8000 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8000 vs Sony TX55 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8000 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX55 |
Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8000 | - |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2009-07-01 | 2011-07-24 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-102mm (3.6x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.1 | f/3.5-4.8 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.3 inches |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1,230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine OLED display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 182g (0.40 pounds) | 109g (0.24 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 93 x 54 x 13mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | NP-BN |
Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal | microSD/SDHC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $380 | $350 |