Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Also Known as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe 8010 was revealed 7 years earlier than the FZ2500 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving into a full comparison, here is a simple view of how the 8010 grades vs the FZ2500 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Panasonic FZ2500
| 8010 | FZ2500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus 8010
| FZ2500 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2016 | February 2010 | Newer by 80 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic FZ2500
| 8010 | FZ2500 |
|---|
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 provides exterior measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has specifications of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") having a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic FZ2500 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 8010 versus the FZ2500.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and FZ2500 is 92 and 53 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The image underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and FZ2500.
To sum up, each of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 8010 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8010 | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2016-09-19 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 915g (2.02 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | DMW-BLC12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $600 | $998 |