Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
The following is a in depth analysis of the Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 8010 was introduced 5 months prior to the FZ35 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 8010 scores vs the FZ35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Panasonic FZ35
| 8010 | FZ35 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus 8010
| FZ35 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic FZ35
| 8010 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | July 2010 | Same age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equal screen size |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8010 offers physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has measurements of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the 8010 vs the FZ35.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and FZ35 is 92 and 72 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor dimensions only by looking through a spec sheet. The image here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and FZ35.
As you can see, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus 8010 to result in greater detail using its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively.
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 8010 | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 397g (0.88 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $999 |