Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc714/fc714eac2cd11c3cc555c53e8fdbf176379a4b0b" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 front"
87 Imaging
52 Features
65 Overall
57
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-250mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 312g - 111 x 65 x 44mm
- Announced January 2016
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-TZ100
- New Model is Panasonic ZS200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and ZS100 (20MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and ZS100 (1") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The 8010 was unveiled 7 years before the ZS100 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS100 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a short highlight of how the 8010 matches up vs the ZS100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Panasonic ZS100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Panasonic ZS100
8010 | ZS100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS100 over the Olympus 8010
ZS100 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2016 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 72 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Panasonic ZS100
8010 | ZS100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 comes with physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS100 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") along with a weight of 312 grams (0.69 lbs).
Look at the Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the 8010 versus the ZS100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30ed5/30ed5d3ff786aa5b44b2f9443a26ea25b82486dd" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 size comparison Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and ZS100 is 92 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/133a2/133a2b6a2f7da6f8001651ede98240eeaae8bbc7" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 top view buttons comparison Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to envision the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and ZS100.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 8010 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic ZS100 will resolve greater detail having an extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older 8010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67c2f/67c2f883245c7eabae2d3a81878290528750ba0a" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 sensor size comparison Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6ff5/e6ff5bf72daa7b466b13478d3b30f77d5fad443f" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 8010 vs Panasonic ZS100 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS100 |
Also referred to as | mju Tough 8010 | Lumix DMC-TZ100 |
Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2016-01-05 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,166k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 9.9 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 8.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 4K/UHD (3840 x 2160 @ 30p/24p), 1920 x 1080 @ 60p/60i/30p/24p, 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 312g (0.69 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 111 x 65 x 44mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 559 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $600 | $700 |