Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
50 Imaging
76 Features
52 Overall
66
Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 40MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 1600
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Pentax 645AF2 Mount
- 1480g - 156 x 117 x 119mm
- Revealed March 2010
- Newer Model is Pentax 645Z
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus 8010 and Pentax 645D, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Pro DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a substantial gap between the sensor resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and 645D (40MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and 645D (Medium format) posses different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8010 was announced very close to the 645D so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Pentax 645D being a Large SLR camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8010 scores versus the 645D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Pentax 645D. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Pentax 645D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Pentax 645D
| 8010 | 645D |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax 645D over the Olympus 8010
| 645D | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Pentax 645D
| 8010 | 645D | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 |  | March 2010 | Similar age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8010 enjoys outside dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax 645D has proportions of 156mm x 117mm x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") accompanied by a weight of 1480 grams (3.26 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8010 and Pentax 645D in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the 8010 versus the 645D.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and 645D is 92 and 50 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over specifications. The image underneath should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and 645D.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The 8010 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF trickier and the Pentax 645D will offer more detail with its extra 27MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos more aggressively.
Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 8010 vs Pentax 645D Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Pentax 645D | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Pentax 645D |
| Also called as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Pro DSLR |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2010-03-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Large SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Prime II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Medium format |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 44 x 33mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 40MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 7264 x 5440 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax 645AF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 6 |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 0.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle and with AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.85x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/125 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 1480g (3.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 156 x 117 x 119mm (6.1" x 4.6" x 4.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 82 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 24.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1262 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 800 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 2 |
| Cost at release | $600 | $4,000 |