Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
92 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Released February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched September 2011
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe 8010 was unveiled 19 months prior to the GR Digital IV making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8010 matches up versus the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV. The full galleries are available at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
8010 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus 8010
GR Digital IV | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2011 | February 2010 | More recent by 19 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1230k | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
8010 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither comes with Touch display |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 comes with physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 8010 versus the GR Digital IV.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and GR Digital IV is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and GR Digital IV.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The 8010 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus 8010 will produce more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older 8010 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/1.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 1s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 grams (0.54 pounds) | 190 grams (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 shots |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $600 | $599 |