Clicky

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
29
Overall
33
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Released February 2010
  • Other Name is mju Tough 8010
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Launched September 2011
  • Earlier Model is Ricoh GR Digital III
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and GR Digital IV (10MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") have totally different sensor sizes.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The 8010 was unveiled 19 months prior to the GR Digital IV making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before getting right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise view of how the 8010 matches up versus the GR Digital IV with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 8010 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Olympus 8010

 GR Digital IV 8010 
LaunchedSeptember 2011February 2010More recent by 19 months
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1230k230kCrisper display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 8010 GR Digital IV 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch display Neither comes with Touch display

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 comes with physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GR Digital IV has specifications of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Examine the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the 8010 versus the GR Digital IV.

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and GR Digital IV is 92 and 92 respectively.

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Often, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and GR Digital IV.

As you have seen, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The 8010 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus 8010 will produce more detail having an extra 3MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics more aggressively. The older 8010 will be behind in sensor innovation.

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus 8010
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
28
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
41
you can focus manually
delivers RAW files
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus 8010 Street photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography details
59
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than others (245g)
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8010 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR Digital IV as a Sports photography camera
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13MP)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proof
max frames per second very slow (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery life (390 shots)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus 8010 Travel photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography highlights
64
environment proof
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
heavier than others (245g)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
slow max aperture (f3.9)
67
better than average battery life (390 per charge)
flash built-in
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8010 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography features
40
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (13 megapixels)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
53
you can focus manually
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (390 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus 8010 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging factors
27
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic jack
heavier than others (245 grams)
29
fast maximum aperture (f1.9)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8010Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Also called mju Tough 8010 -
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Compact
Released 2010-02-02 2011-09-15
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4288 x 3216 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-140mm (5.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/1.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.9 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/4s 1s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter rate 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 245 grams (0.54 pounds) 190 grams (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 shots
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model Li-50B DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch cost $600 $599