Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c39/80c393637c7e1700b3dbd116480a434b8bf25baf" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f30/e3f308a0d9434d86db129d3a675997be5821abbe" alt="Ricoh GR III front Ricoh GR III front"
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Earlier Model is Ricoh GR III
- New Model is Ricoh GR III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GR III, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the image resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and GR III (24MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The 8010 was manufactured 9 years prior to the GR III and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the 8010 scores vs the GR III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh GR III
8010 | GR III |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus 8010
GR III | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2018 | ![]() | February 2010 | More recent by 105 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GR III
8010 | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 offers exterior measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GR III in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the 8010 against the GR III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33d79/33d793a0032d15ffc9c678c398ad8b4a8d1370ea" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and GR III is 92 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cdde/6cdde7435d8df6f5a90ed2d8b116bf95af300b1f" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8010 and GR III.
Clearly, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The 8010 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR III will offer greater detail due to its extra 11 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older 8010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ffe1/9ffe16af7f785d69a5ea54c183ee8d36449b20f2" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison"
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b6a9/3b6a95429461b34c9e340ea1ffabb8b24c85406b" alt="Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh GR III |
Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 6cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,037k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245g (0.54 lbs) | 257g (0.57 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | Li-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $600 | $900 |