Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
In this write-up, we are analyzing the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is fairly similar but the 8010 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) feature different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 8010 was launched 7 months earlier than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the 8010 scores vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
8010 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Olympus 8010
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | 8010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2010 | February 2010 | More recent by 7 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
8010 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 provides outer measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has sizing of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") and a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the 8010 and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 92 and 88 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements just by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Clearly, both of these cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The 8010 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus 8010 will offer you greater detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The older 8010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Other name | mju Tough 8010 | - |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lb) | 140 gr (0.31 lb) |
Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-50B | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $600 | $566 |