Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
Portability
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Portability
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Released February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
Ricoh WG-4 GPS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 8010 was launched 5 years prior to the WG-4 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the 8010 grades versus the WG-4 GPS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 8010 | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Olympus 8010
| WG-4 GPS | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 48 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| 8010 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 has got external measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view size comparison of the 8010 and the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and WG-4 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The image below should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the 8010 and WG-4 GPS.
As you can see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 GPS to produce more detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged 8010 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus 8010 Portrait photography info
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Portrait photography info
decent MP (13 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
you can focus manually
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes face detect focusing
no manual mode
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Olympus 8010 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Street photography factors
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than competition (245 grams)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
screen does not articulate
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
heavier than others (235 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Olympus 8010 Sports photography information
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sports photography information
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proof
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
includes tracking focus
weather sealing
very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery pack (240 shots)
no phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Olympus 8010 Travel photography advice
Ricoh WG-4 GPS Travel photography advice
environment proof
decent MP (13MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (245g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
weather sealing
decent megapixels (16MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
low battery pack (240 CIPA)
heavier than others (235 grams)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus 8010 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Landscape photography camera
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent MP (13MP)
environment proof
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
small screen (2.7")
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse mode
you can focus manually
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
weather sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
low battery pack (240 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus 8010 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh WG-4 GPS as a Vlogging camera
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing mic port
heavier than competition (245g)
reasonably wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
missing mic socket
heavier than others (235g)
Photography Glossary
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 235g (0.52 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $600 | $210 |