Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Released February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, both Waterproof cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is fairly close and they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 8010 was launched 6 years before the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the 8010 grades vs the WG-5 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| 8010 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus 8010
| WG-5 GPS | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2015 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 61 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| 8010 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 provides outer dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has specifications of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the 8010 and the WG-5 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8010 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 8010 will be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 236 gr (0.52 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photographs |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $600 | $500 |