Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh WG-70, both Waterproof digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the WG-70 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 8010 was introduced 11 years earlier than the WG-70 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the 8010 scores vs the WG-70 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh WG-70
| 8010 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus 8010
| WG-70 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2020 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 121 months |
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-70
| 8010 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8010 has outside measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8010 versus Ricoh WG-70 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the 8010 compared to the WG-70.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and WG-70 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking technical specs. The picture here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the 8010 and WG-70.
As you can tell, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-70 to resolve greater detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Also referred to as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2010-02-02 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) | 193 gr (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $600 | $280 |