Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Released September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
The following is a thorough comparison of the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-M1, both Waterproof cameras by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is relatively close and they use the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8010 was released 5 years before the WG-M1 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple summation of how the 8010 scores vs the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| 8010 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Clearer screen (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Olympus 8010
| WG-M1 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | September 2014 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 56 months |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-M1
| 8010 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8010 comes with physical measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has proportions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Olympus 8010 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the 8010 against the WG-M1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and WG-M1 is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions merely by looking through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and WG-M1.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-M1 to result in more detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more aged 8010 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 8010 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 115 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 shots |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $600 | $2,000 |