Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL50
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 8010 was unveiled 12 months later than the SL202 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the 8010 scores against the SL202 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are available at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Samsung SL202
| 8010 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 |  | February 2009 | Fresher by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Olympus 8010
| SL202 | 8010 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Samsung SL202
| 8010 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Identical display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8010 provides outside measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the 8010 versus the SL202.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and SL202 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by viewing specifications. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and SL202.
To sum up, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus 8010 to result in greater detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The more modern 8010 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung SL202 |
| Alternate name | mju Tough 8010 | PL50 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $600 | $140 |