Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Released February 2010
- Also referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
The following is a complete assessment of the Olympus 8010 and Samsung ST65, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the ST65 (14MP) is relatively similar and they feature the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8010 was brought out 11 months earlier than the ST65 so they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before getting in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise overview of how the 8010 matches up vs the ST65 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Samsung ST65. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Samsung ST65
| 8010 | ST65 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Olympus 8010
| ST65 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 | February 2010 | Newer by 11 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Samsung ST65
| 8010 | ST65 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus 8010 provides physical dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung ST65 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Olympus 8010 and Samsung ST65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the 8010 versus the ST65.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the 8010 and ST65 is 92 and 99 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading technical specs. The picture below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the 8010 and ST65.
As you have seen, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Samsung ST65 to offer more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 8010 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung ST65 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Samsung ST65 |
| Also called as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | - |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | () |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | - |
| Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $130 |