Clicky

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
29
Overall
32
Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
61
Features
38
Overall
51

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus 8010
(Full Review)
  • 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
  • Revealed February 2010
  • Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Revealed February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The 8010 was unveiled 5 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 8010 scores vs the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 8010 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus 8010

 DP2 Quattro 8010 
RevealedFebruary 2014February 2010Fresher by 49 months
Focus manually Very accurate focus
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution920k230kClearer display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 8010 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8010 enjoys exterior measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

See the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 8010 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and DP2 Quattro.

Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8010 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with extra detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older 8010 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus 8010 Portrait photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography details
27
good MP (13 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
76
focusing manually
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
has face detect focus
saves RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus 8010 Street photography details
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography details
58
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather proof
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
more heavy than others in class (245g)
60
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus 8010 Sports photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography advice
42
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (13MP)
supports tracking focus
weather proof
slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
47
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
fixed focal length (45mm)
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect auto focus
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus 8010
Travel photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
63
weather proof
good MP (13MP)
flash built-in
quite wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (245 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
53
MP count good (20MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus 8010 Landscape photography highlights
Sigma DP2 Quattro Landscape photography highlights
39
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (13 megapixels)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
tiny screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Timelapse mode
59
focusing manually
screen size is good (3 inch)
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (45mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus 8010
Vlogging with Sigma DP2 Quattro
27
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
display isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
no microphone port
more heavy than others in class (245g)
9
no video recording
Photography Glossary

Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus 8010 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus Stylus Tough 8010Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Also called mju Tough 8010 -
Category Waterproof Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-02-02 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic III TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 27.7mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 13 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Max aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 1cm -
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/4 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.00 m no built-in flash
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format H.264 -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 245g (0.54 pounds) 395g (0.87 pounds)
Physical dimensions 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID Li-50B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 seconds) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC, Internal -
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $600 $931