Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
70 Imaging
61 Features
38 Overall
51
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Revealed February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Revealed February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe 8010 was unveiled 5 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the 8010 scores vs the DP2 Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
| 8010 | DP2 Quattro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus 8010
| DP2 Quattro | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 | February 2010 | Fresher by 49 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
| 8010 | DP2 Quattro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8010 enjoys exterior measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") accompanied by a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the 8010 versus the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and DP2 Quattro is 92 and 70 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual underneath might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and DP2 Quattro.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The 8010 with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will provide you with extra detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a bit more aggressively. The older 8010 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 8010 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sigma |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
| Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-02-02 | 2014-02-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | TRUE III engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video file format | H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 395g (0.87 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | Li-50B | BP-51 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $931 |