Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
62 Imaging
53 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
- Released June 2008
- Newer Model is Sony A380
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus 8010 and Sony A350, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the A350 (14MP) is very well matched but the 8010 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
Photography GlossaryThe 8010 was manufactured 21 months after the A350 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick summary of how the 8010 scores vs the A350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Sony Alpha DSLR-A350. The entire galleries are available at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Sony A350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sony A350
| 8010 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | June 2008 | More modern by 21 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus 8010
| A350 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sony A350
| 8010 | A350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus 8010 features exterior measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Sony A350 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).
Check out the Olympus 8010 and Sony A350 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the 8010 vs the A350.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and A350 is 92 and 62 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking specs. The image underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and A350.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The 8010 because of its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Sony A350 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The younger 8010 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Olympus 8010 vs Sony A350 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 |
| Other name | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2008-06-06 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 372.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 143 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
| Video format | H.264 | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 lb) | 674 gr (1.49 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | 65 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 595 |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32 |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $600 |
