Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
90 Imaging
63 Features
48 Overall
57
Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- " Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 216g - 74 x 70 x 53mm
- Introduced September 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and QX1 (20MP) and the 8010 (1/2.3") and QX1 (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe 8010 was launched 5 years before the QX1 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX1 being a Lens-style camera.
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the 8010 matches up vs the QX1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Sony Alpha QX1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Sony QX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sony QX1
| 8010 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | " | Bigger screen (+2.7") |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 0k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX1 over the Olympus 8010
| QX1 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 55 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sony QX1
| 8010 | QX1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8010 comes with external measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony QX1 has proportions of 74mm x 70mm x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 216 grams (0.48 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the 8010 versus the QX1.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and QX1 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading specifications. The image here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the 8010 and QX1.
Plainly, both the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The 8010 because of its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more challenging and the Sony QX1 will offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus 8010 vs Sony QX1 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha QX1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Alpha QX1 |
| Also Known as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Lens-style |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2014-09-03 |
| Physical type | Compact | Lens-style |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.2 x 15.4mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 357.3mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5456 x 3632 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 16000 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | - |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 0k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames/s | 4.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 216g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 74 x 70 x 53mm (2.9" x 2.8" x 2.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 440 photos |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | NP-FW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $600 | $500 |