Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
91 Imaging
44 Features
63 Overall
51
Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 245g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Introduced April 2015
Photography Glossary Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V Overview
Following is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the 8010 (13MP) and HX90V (18MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe 8010 was revealed 6 years earlier than the HX90V which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a complete comparison, here is a quick overview of how the 8010 matches up against the HX90V with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus 8010 Gallery & Sony HX90V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sony HX90V
| 8010 | HX90V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX90V over the Olympus 8010
| HX90V | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 63 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+691k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sony HX90V
| 8010 | HX90V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Neither offers Touch screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus 8010 offers external measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony HX90V has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the 8010 against the HX90V.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and HX90V is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and HX90V.
As you can tell, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Sony HX90V to offer you greater detail because of its extra 5 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged 8010 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus 8010 vs Sony HX90V Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX90V |
| Otherwise known as | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-02 | 2015-04-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 18 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-6.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 921k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 638k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.5x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 30 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 360 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-50B | NP-BX1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $600 | $440 |
