Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
34 Features
30 Overall
32
Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
- 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
- Released February 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus 8010 and Sony T900, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the T900 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe 8010 was launched 12 months later than the T900 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the 8010 scores against the T900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900. The complete galleries are available at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Sony T900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Sony T900
| 8010 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2010 |  | February 2009 | More recent by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus 8010
| T900 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3.5" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") |
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+692k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Sony T900
| 8010 | T900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus 8010 features exterior measurements of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony T900 has measurements of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8010 and Sony T900 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the 8010 and the T900.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the 8010 and T900 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The graphic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the 8010 and T900.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the Olympus 8010 to provide more detail utilizing its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern 8010 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus 8010 vs Sony T900 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 |
| Alternate name | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-10.0 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 922k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 2 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 2.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245 grams (0.54 lb) | 143 grams (0.32 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | Li-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $600 | $300 |