Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly comparable and they possess the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-850 iHS was manufactured 2 years later than the VG-160 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a quick overview of how the TG-850 iHS matches up vs the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus VG-160
| TG-850 iHS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| VG-160 | TG-850 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Olympus VG-160
| TG-850 iHS | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-850 iHS comes with exterior dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-850 iHS and the VG-160.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and VG-160 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The graphic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-850 iHS and VG-160.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-850 iHS to provide greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a little more aggressively. The more modern TG-850 iHS should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VG-160 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | 165 photographs |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $90 |