Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-850 iHS was introduced 2 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-850 iHS grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
| TG-850 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | July 2011 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| VR-320 | TG-850 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Olympus VR-320
| TG-850 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS comes with external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-850 iHS vs the VR-320.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-850 iHS and VR-320.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent TG-850 iHS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $179 |