Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras posses the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-850 iHS was introduced 2 years later than the VR-320 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-850 iHS grades versus the VR-320 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
| TG-850 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2014 | July 2011 | Fresher by 31 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| VR-320 | TG-850 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Olympus VR-320
| TG-850 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
| Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS comes with external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Olympus VR-320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-850 iHS vs the VR-320.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by checking out technical specs. The photograph underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-850 iHS and VR-320.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to provide extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent TG-850 iHS provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
| Full resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $250 | $179 |