Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
55 Imaging
55 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Released February 2019
- Replaced the Panasonic FZ1000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
The following is a complete analysis of the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is fairly comparable but the TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") and FZ1000 II (1") feature different sensor size.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-850 iHS was revealed 6 years prior to the FZ1000 II which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TG-850 iHS grades vs the FZ1000 II in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
| TG-850 iHS | FZ1000 II |
|---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| FZ1000 II | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2019 |  | January 2014 | Newer by 61 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1240k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+780k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic FZ1000 II
| TG-850 iHS | FZ1000 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus TG-850 iHS comes with outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 II has specifications of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") accompanied by a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the TG-850 iHS versus the FZ1000 II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and FZ1000 II is 91 and 55 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The image underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and FZ1000 II.
As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-850 iHS with its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will provide extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-850 iHS will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
| Type | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2019-02-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Min enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 49 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-4.0 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 60 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 12.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) | 808 grams (1.78 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 350 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | DMW-BLC12PP |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $250 | $898 |
