Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
86 Imaging
54 Features
66 Overall
58
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-360mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 340g - 111 x 66 x 45mm
- Revealed February 2018
- Also referred to as Lumix DC-TZ200
- Succeeded the Panasonic ZS100
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Panasonic ZS200, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the ZS200 (20MP) is pretty close but the TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") and ZS200 (1") have totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-850 iHS was launched 5 years earlier than the ZS200 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic ZS200 being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-850 iHS matches up versus the ZS200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Panasonic ZS200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Panasonic ZS200
TG-850 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS200 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
ZS200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2018 | January 2014 | More modern by 49 months | |
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1240k | 460k | Clearer screen (+780k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic ZS200
TG-850 iHS | ZS200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has outside measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS200 has dimensions of 111mm x 66mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") with a weight of 340 grams (0.75 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Panasonic ZS200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-850 iHS compared to the ZS200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-850 iHS and ZS200 is 91 and 86 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes simply by viewing specs. The pic below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and ZS200.
All in all, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-850 iHS because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Panasonic ZS200 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots more aggressively. The more aged TG-850 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic ZS200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS200 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DC-TZ200 |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2018-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | MOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 460k dots | 1,240k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,330k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.53x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lbs) | 340 grams (0.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 111 x 66 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 370 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $250 | $800 |