Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 24 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-2 iHS matches up versus the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
| TG-2 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| VR-320 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-320
| TG-2 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outer measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and VR-320.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to produce extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | OLED | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $380 | $179 |