Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Olympus VR-330
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-320, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both offered by Olympus. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 24 months later than the VR-320 making them a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-2 iHS matches up versus the VR-320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus VR-320
| TG-2 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | June 2013 |  | July 2011 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| VR-320 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-320
| TG-2 iHS | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outer measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Olympus VR-320 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and VR-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specifications. The visual here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and VR-320.
To sum up, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus VR-320 to produce extra detail because of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Olympus VR-320 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | OLED | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $380 | $179 |
