Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41


65 Imaging
36 Features
64 Overall
47
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Earlier Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Successor is Panasonic FZ300

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Panasonic FZ200, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap among the resolutions of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The TG-850 iHS was announced 19 months later than the FZ200 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a concise overview of how the TG-850 iHS scores vs the FZ200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Panasonic FZ200
TG-850 iHS | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | July 2012 | More recent by 19 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
FZ200 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic FZ200
TG-850 iHS | FZ200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same screen resolution |
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-850 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Panasonic FZ200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-850 iHS and the FZ200.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and FZ200 is 91 and 65 respectively.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by viewing technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-850 iHS and FZ200.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to render greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern TG-850 iHS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-29 | 2012-07-18 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 460k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,312k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.50 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) | 588 grams (1.30 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 37 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 114 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 540 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $250 | $499 |