Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Additionally Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-850 iHS was unveiled 3 years later than the FZ35 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the TG-850 iHS matches up against the FZ35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Panasonic FZ35
TG-850 iHS | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | July 2010 | More recent by 44 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
FZ35 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Panasonic FZ35
TG-850 iHS | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has got exterior measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-850 iHS compared to the FZ35.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and FZ35 is 91 and 72 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and FZ35.
As you can see, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to result in extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent TG-850 iHS will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2014-01-29 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 8.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 lb) | 397 grams (0.88 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $250 | $999 |