Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2959/b2959208e447dba4f569f63d7fd2c62d2a4ed005" alt="Pentax K-x front Pentax K-x front"
69 Imaging
52 Features
47 Overall
50
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 580g - 123 x 92 x 68mm
- Launched December 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and K-x (12MP) and the TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") and K-x (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The TG-850 iHS was introduced 4 years later than the K-x and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-x being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-850 iHS scores against the K-x with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Pentax K-x. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Pentax K-x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Pentax K-x
TG-850 iHS | K-x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2014 | ![]() | December 2009 | Fresher by 50 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-x over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
K-x | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Pentax K-x
TG-850 iHS | K-x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-850 iHS enjoys physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-x has proportions of 123mm x 92mm x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-850 iHS vs the K-x.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1309/f1309a27279145edb52259d8598e2fa3839c846f" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and K-x is 91 and 69 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf0a8/bf0a8eb7477c461839251a4a1e9f1411a3691ab2" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizing purely by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and K-x.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-850 iHS having a smaller sensor will make getting bokeh more challenging and the Olympus TG-850 iHS will provide you with extra detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more recent TG-850 iHS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1345c/1345c5c5a4974c05f2981dcb3e2d7720c2d1d199" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/950b5/950b5f3b4d0025a5bff887b6a55f4d862ccd8717" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax K-x Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Pentax K-x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Pentax K-x |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2009-12-23 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Prime |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Number of lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 16.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 416 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 580 gr (1.28 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 123 x 92 x 68mm (4.8" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 811 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 1900 pictures |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $250 | $600 |