Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
92 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 178g - 97 x 61 x 33mm
- Released July 2011
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Pentax RZ10, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the RZ10 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-850 iHS was introduced 2 years later than the RZ10 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a short introduction of how the TG-850 iHS scores against the RZ10 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Pentax Optio RZ10. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Pentax RZ10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Pentax RZ10
TG-850 iHS | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | July 2011 | Fresher by 31 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax RZ10 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
RZ10 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Pentax RZ10
TG-850 iHS | RZ10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS offers physical dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Pentax RZ10 has dimensions of 97mm x 61mm x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 178 grams (0.39 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Pentax RZ10 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the TG-850 iHS compared to the RZ10.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and RZ10 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The photograph here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-850 iHS and RZ10.
Clearly, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-850 iHS to give greater detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher TG-850 iHS provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Pentax RZ10 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Pentax Optio RZ10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Pentax Optio RZ10 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 2.80 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lbs) | 178 gr (0.39 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 97 x 61 x 33mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | 178 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $250 | $200 |