Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
92 Imaging
34 Features
35 Overall
34
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Launched January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
In this article, we will be comparing the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh CX3, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the resolutions of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-850 iHS was announced 3 years later than the CX3 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the TG-850 iHS scores versus the CX3 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Ricoh CX3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Ricoh CX3
| TG-850 iHS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 45 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| CX3 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh CX3
| TG-850 iHS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-850 iHS provides external dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh CX3 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-850 iHS compared to the CX3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-850 iHS and CX3 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor measurements only by going through specifications. The visual underneath will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-850 iHS and CX3.
To sum up, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Olympus TG-850 iHS to show extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer TG-850 iHS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-01-29 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $250 | $329 |
