Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e742/4e74284e98f8a2f698e6b96487e93d8958a78f02" alt="Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-850 iHS was launched 3 years after the CX4 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the TG-850 iHS scores against the CX4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Ricoh CX4
TG-850 iHS | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2010 | More modern by 42 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
CX4 | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh CX4
TG-850 iHS | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-850 iHS features external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-850 iHS against the CX4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30480/3048088f89238e1b2f6a77e773eff780ef2a9ff1" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-850 iHS and CX4 is 91 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ef008/ef0084ead7fe1003372722391180d67f3aeb68ea" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizes only by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-850 iHS and CX4.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-850 iHS to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more modern TG-850 iHS will have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84be8/84be8a01135c8529494713efd3820dc277d84b83" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0d0d/a0d0deec5850920279d18df300883b7f789446f2" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh CX4 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2014-01-29 | 2010-08-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 pounds) | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $250 | $211 |