Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3f30/e3f308a0d9434d86db129d3a675997be5821abbe" alt="Ricoh GR III front Ricoh GR III front"
90 Imaging
69 Features
62 Overall
66
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Updated by Ricoh GR III
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and GR III (24MP) and the TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-850 iHS was released 5 years prior to the GR III and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting through a complete comparison, below is a brief summation of how the TG-850 iHS grades vs the GR III in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS and Ricoh GR III. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Ricoh GR III
TG-850 iHS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
GR III | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2018 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 56 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+577k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh GR III
TG-850 iHS | GR III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-850 iHS has got external measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-850 iHS against the GR III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f876/6f876f30311a82947cc82e1d43b54d9f19efc027" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-850 iHS and GR III is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8c2f/a8c2f238bdb995c9eb7068f9bc3bb21b7a02a71a" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The photograph below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-850 iHS and GR III.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-850 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Ricoh GR III will offer you more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The older TG-850 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45568/45568602b7312e6f86804a1e9b8972a21b089e0e" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f8aa/8f8aa3d180a2e90f864ce8e4359609c6def9093c" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh GR III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh GR III |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2014-01-29 | 2018-09-25 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/2.8-16 |
Macro focus distance | - | 6cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 1,037 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218g (0.48 lb) | 257g (0.57 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $250 | $900 |