Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Released January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Released May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh WG-80, both Waterproof cameras by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-850 iHS was brought out 9 years prior to the WG-80 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-850 iHS grades against the WG-80 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Ricoh WG-80. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Ricoh WG-80
| TG-850 iHS | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.70" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
| WG-80 | TG-850 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | May 2022 | January 2014 | More modern by 101 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh WG-80
| TG-850 iHS | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-850 iHS enjoys outer measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Ricoh WG-80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-850 iHS and the WG-80.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and WG-80 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very tough to see the gap in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The image underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-850 iHS and WG-80.
To sum up, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photos however you need to take the age of the cameras into account. The more aged TG-850 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Ricoh WG-80 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Released | 2014-01-29 | 2022-05-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4616 x 3464 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.70 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 218g (0.48 pounds) | 193g (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | 300 photos |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $250 | $300 |