Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4adb4/4adb4c1935c2b34521695695a5f59e7ed6c45a23" alt="Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G front"
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2014
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-481mm (F) lens
- 305g - 129 x 71 x 19mm
- Released August 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-850 iHS (16MP) and the Galaxy Camera 3G (16MP) is fairly close and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-850 iHS was launched 18 months later than the Galaxy Camera 3G making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-850 iHS scores against the Galaxy Camera 3G when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery & Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
TG-850 iHS | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2014 | ![]() | August 2012 | Fresher by 18 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 0k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
Galaxy Camera 3G | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 4.8" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-850 iHS and Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G
TG-850 iHS | Galaxy Camera 3G | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-850 iHS provides outer dimensions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G has measurements of 129mm x 71mm x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") having a weight of 305 grams (0.67 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-850 iHS versus Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-850 iHS and the Galaxy Camera 3G.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5da9e/5da9e54d08b4933502314ff1af8fe78b8a0fa4ec" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-850 iHS and Galaxy Camera 3G is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/975de/975de91204972524ea2a250dcba6029989932b93" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizing purely by looking through technical specs. The visual underneath might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-850 iHS and Galaxy Camera 3G.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same resolution so you can expect comparable quality of photos though you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The newer TG-850 iHS will have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36e31/36e31821d45adeab89ef39d75b217ec9cf63765c" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8066c/8066ce3a80ab0b084149e4e8ac9368e14ff15bd8" alt="Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-850 iHS vs Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G Specifications
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | Samsung Galaxy Camera 3G |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2014-01-29 | 2012-08-29 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | 1.4GHz Quad-Core |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Max resolution | 4616 x 3464 | - |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 21-105mm (5.0x) | 23-481mm (20.9x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.7 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 4.8 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD | 308 ppi, HD Super Clear Touch Display |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | - | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Yes | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 218 gr (0.48 lb) | 305 gr (0.67 lb) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") | 129 x 71 x 19mm (5.1" x 2.8" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | micro SD/micro SDHC/micro SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $250 | $606 |